Top latest Five h4831 vs h4831sc Urban news
Top latest Five h4831 vs h4831sc Urban news
Blog Article
I picked up a 50ct. box of 160 Nosler Accubonds, but I'm hesitant to burn off the powder and projectiles on workup when all I've is fifty bullets. But I really need to find a bullet inside the 160 class that my older rifle likes.
They may have done identically for me. Like Absolutely everyone else I rushed to obtain the more recent SC Edition but have now switched again. Preferably you need about 100% loading density. If you have sufficient scenario capability for the H4831(extensive) you happen to be almost certainly superior off.
This is without doubt one of the greatest causes reloaders are admonished to work with new data only; and to start out very low each and every time you have a different wide range of powder. You do not seriously know (Until the corporation informs you so) that your new lot of powder was even manufactured at the same manufacturing unit given that the powder you obtain a couple of years in the past.
Yes you are able to. They may be the same exact powder however the SC powder is just Reduce shorter so it meters far better.
In any case, I knew the two pounds of H4831SC made use of exactly the same data, but I didn't know no matter whether there was nearly anything diverse involving a pound of powder labeled "Severe" and 1 not so labeled. A simply call to Hodgdon verified they were being in reality similar and the only variation was The brand within the label.
Any load data to assist that? My 1st imagined is it's actually not about to burn off every one of the way and velocities might be slow and all over the place. May be a good fireworks Display screen!
I do not like to work up a load employing just one number of powder and then have to operate up yet again because I operate out and also have to begin utilizing a new large amount h4831 vs h4831sc number.
Im under the knowing I need to use h4831sc. I've go through that these powders are similar Apart from the shorter grain measurement on the sc. Need to I still be looking out for h4831 vs h4831sc h4381sc?
I have discovered the precise reverse to become genuine in my gun. H4831SC was the slowest powder with 180 g Accubonds. RL22 was a considerably faster and Similarly correct powder in my three hundred Win Mag.
[e mail safeguarded] gn and one hundred fifteen CT's, I have killed extra Deer using this combo than many of the rifles I have put together, Operate up to this although the sweet place will probably be all over fifty four, I am a Two Bit-06 nut and I have some stuff tat operates rather well for me When your interested
I essential a tiny bit more myself so I went forward and grabbed the 8lb jug being included for quite a while (and possess loads of exactly the same large amount of powder).
Like Absolutely everyone said, the SC stands for “shorter Lower” and is particularly a little bit simpler to meter. Would make you query why they'd however make the regular one particular.
Am i able to believe that H4831 could be substituted for H4831sc ? I realize the Bodily big difference but will it influence the burn up or velocity? I believe not but I'm not h4831 vs h4831sc a hundred% positive.
I found that my 7mag 160 partitions were being sub MOA with 4831sc with minimal to min expenses. I’m talking 2700 (it's possible 2800) fps, it had been a minimal 60s grain charge within a Norma case. Not what I had been trying to find, but accurate However.